Sexual Harassment
(A Code in Practice)
4. A Short Guide to the Code of Practice
4.1 General principles
Every employer, regardless of size, must take all reasonable steps to prevent sexual harassment in the workplace. This means that employers must actively implement precautionary measures to minimise the risk of sexual harassment occurring and to respond appropriately when harassment does occur.
Under the Sex Discrimination Act, an employer may be held vicariously liable for sexual harassment when the employer has not taken all reasonable steps to prevent sexual harassment in the workplace.
What constitutes all reasonable steps is not defined in the Sex Discrimination Act and is determined on a case by case basis. What is reasonable for a large corporation may not be reasonable for small business. When deciding what level of preventative action is reasonable, employers should consider the nature of their workplace, including the following.
-
The size and structure of the organisation: large organisations may need to organise formal information and training sessions to ensure that all employees are aware of and understand the organisation’s sexual harassment policy. In a small business it may be reasonable to provide copies of the policy to employees and have an informal discussion with employees to ensure they understand the policy.
-
Available resources: in a large organisation, it might be reasonable that a budget be allocated to sexual harassment training and all employees attend the training. In a small business where finances are limited it may not be reasonable to send each employee to sexual harassment training, but instead the employer could ask that each employee read the sexual harassment policy and fill out a questionnaire designed to ensure that the employee understands the policy.
-
A history of sexual harassment and gender hostility: employers may have to take particularly strong steps to combat harassment in such circumstances.
-
Any other relevant factor, including geographic isolation of the work location, duties which require employees to work in close physical proximity or where there are “live-in” arrangements.
There are two main actions that employers must take to avoid liability for sexual harassment.
-
Take steps to prevent sexual harassment from occurring: in order to prevent sexual harassment an employer should have a sexual harassment policy, implement it as fully as possible and monitor its effectiveness.
-
If sexual harassment does occur, take appropriate remedial action: in order to remedy sexual harassment an employer should have appropriate procedures for dealing with complaints once they are made.
4.2 Explanatory notes
It is not possible to guarantee employers that they will not be vicariously liable for sexual harassment, even if they take particular steps to prevent harassment. This is because liability is decided by courts on a case-by-case basis. However, the case law does provide some guidance for employers on how they can meet their legal obligations.
In short, there are two main actions that employers must take to avoid liability for sexual harassment:
1. take steps to prevent sexual harassment from occurring; and
2. if sexual harassment does occur, take appropriate remedial action.
To prevent sexual harassment an employer should have a sexual harassment policy, implement it as fully as possible and monitor its effectiveness.
In order to remedy sexual harassment an employer should have appropriate procedures set up for dealing with complaints once they are made.
The next sections give practical advice to employers on how to prevent and remedy sexual harassment. Small businesses should also refer to Chapter 6.
4.2.1 Preventative measures
The key to preventing sexual harassment is for employers and management to make it clear to every employee and workplace participant that sexual harassment is unacceptable in the workplace. This can be done by developing a clear sexual harassment policy, communicating it to each workplace participant and making sure that it is understood. In addition, it is important that appropriate behaviour be modelled by management throughout the workplace.
A written policy on its own is insufficient. A policy that is not implemented through communication, education and enforcement will be of little or no use in discharging liability.
| Workplace example: Internet and e-mail |
Use of Internet and e-mail has transformed the way that workplaces communicate, but they can also be used, intentionally or otherwise, as a form of sexual harassment. Deliberate harassment using the Internet may include downloading offensive screen savers and loading them onto a colleague's computer, sending derogatory e-mails or e-mailing pornographic material. A particular problem with e-mail is that people tend to think of it as a private form of communication. Nothing could be further from the truth: once an e-mail is sent it can be passed on to any number of people, all with the person's or organisation's name attached. The practice, of e-mailing "jokes", offensive material and pornography to workmates, or using workplace computers to e-mail this material externally, is fraught with problems since there is no way of guaranteeing that the material will not offend at least one of its recipients. In addition, use of the Internet and e-mail to access or communicate sexual material can contribute to a hostile working environment, where employees are exposed to offensive material in shared offices, on printers or walking past others' desks. In order to prevent sexual harassment by the Internet and e-mail employers should:
|
Below is a checklist on the general steps necessary to prevent sexual harassment, followed by guidelines specifically on writing a sexual harassment policy.
Guidelines
in Practice: How to prevent sexual harassment |
It is recommended that employers take the following steps to prevent sexual harassment. Get high-level management support
Write and implement a sexual harassment policy
Provide information and training
Encourage appropriate conduct by managers
Create a positive workplace environment
|
4.2.2 Writing a sexual harassment policy
A key aspect of prevention is the development and promotion of a written policy which makes it clear that sexual harassment will not be tolerated under any circumstances. Some employers incorporate information on sexual harassment into a general workplace harassment policy which covers other forms of unlawful harassment (such as harassment on the grounds of race, disability, sexual preference or age). Others decide there is a need for a stand alone sexual harassment policy, particularly if sexual harassment is a common or recurring problem within the workplace. Both options are valid and it is up to employers to decide what is most appropriate for them. If a general policy is adopted, however, it is important that the different types of harassment are well-defined and addressed comprehensively. If the policy is too broad or generic its impact and clarity may be compromised.
It is recommended that an organisation officially launch its sexual harassment policy at a full staff meeting. In a large organisation, the chief executive officer or a senior management representative should endorse the policy and emphasise the fact that all staff are required to comply with it.
An effective means of ensuring that the policy is promoted on an ongoing basis is to periodically put a copy in pay slips. Policies can also be promoted by e-mailing copies to employees and putting a copy on the company Intranet. The policy should also be displayed on notice boards and included in personnel manuals. Employers should provide the policy to new staff as a standard part of induction. Employers may want employees to sign a copy of the policy acknowledging that they received and understood it.
To ensure that the policy is widely promoted and regularly updated, responsibility for circulation and review should be allocated to a specific position or area.
Guidelines
in Practice: How to write a sexual harassment policy |
A sexual harassment policy should include the following. A strong opening statement on the organisation's attitude to sexual harassment This should state that the organisation is committed to ensuring that the working environment is free from sexual harassment, that it will not be tolerated under any circumstances and that disciplinary action will be taken against any employee (or agent) who breaches the policy. To give the policy credibility and maximum impact, the opening statement should appear above the signature of the chief executive officer. An outline of the organisation's objectives regarding sexual harassment This demonstrates that the organisation is committed to a comprehensive strategy for eliminating sexual harassment. Employers may wish to consider something along the following lines. This organisation aims to:
A clearly worded definition of sexual harassment There is no single, universally accepted definition of sexual harassment. However, the definition adopted should be consistent with the legal definition to avoid any confusion. The most important element to emphasise in any definition is that sexual harassment is unwelcome behaviour of a sexual nature. For example, sexual harassment can be defined in the following way.
Some examples of sexual harassment that are relevant to the particular working environment The policy should identify specific examples of sexual harassment, such as:
What sexual harassment is not The policy should explain that sexual harassment is not behaviour which is based on mutual attraction, friendship and respect. If the interaction is consensual, welcome and reciprocated it is not sexual harassment. A statement that sexual harassment is against the law The policy should make it clear that sexual harassment is against the law. Reference should be made to the federal, State or Territory anti-discrimination laws that apply to the organisation. Staff need to know that legal action could be taken against them for sexual harassment and that they could also be exposing the company to liability. The circumstances in which sexual harassment may occur The policy should state that a person may be sexually harassed by a supervisor or manager, co-worker, contractor, service provider, client or customer. Although not all these situations would necessarily give rise to a complaint under the legislation, it makes good sense to provide an internal procedure for dealing with any sexual harassment which could affect the welfare of employees. The policy should also state that sexual harassment is not just unlawful during working hours or in the workplace itself and not only between co-workers. The behaviour is unlawful in any work-related context, including conferences, work functions, office Christmas parties and business or field trips and includes interactions with clients and customers. The consequences that can be imposed if the policy is breached The policy should operate as a general warning to all employees of the consequences they can expect if they do not comply. Depending on the severity of the case, consequences can include an apology, counselling, transfer, dismissal, demotion or other forms of disciplinary action. Employees should also be informed that immediate disciplinary action will be taken against anyone who victimises or retaliates against a person who has complained of sexual harassment. Responsibilities of management and staff The policy should state that the organisation has a legal responsibility to prevent sexual harassment, otherwise it can be liable for the behaviour of its employees. This means that managers and supervisors have a responsibility to:
All staff have a responsibility to:
Information on where individuals can get help, advice or make a complaint The policy should tell employees where they can get help if they are sexually harassed. Depending on the size of the organisation and the system that is in place for dealing with sexual harassment, employees can be advised to approach their manager or supervisor, sexual harassment contact officer, equal employment opportunity officer, human resources manager, industrial relations manager and/or their union delegate. Where possible a number of different contact people of both sexes should be provided so that staff can approach someone they feel comfortable with. It is not appropriate to only give staff the option of approaching their line manager because there may be cases where the manager is the alleged harasser or is perceived to be closely associated with the harasser and therefore not impartial. A brief summary of the options available for dealing with sexual harassment Employees should be advised of the different ways that sexual harassment can be addressed. This includes informal action such as confronting the harasser directly (but only if the individual feels confident enough to do so), making a formal complaint to a manager or using the organisation's internal complaints procedures. The way that complaints will be handled should be documented in the policy or in a separate complaints procedure. Staff can be referred to this if they require more information. Employees can also approach their union, HREOC or the relevant State or Territory anti-discrimination agency for information and confidential advice. |
| Case example: Employees in remote locations |
Where employees are located in remote areas employers will need to be particularly careful that they have been made aware of sexual harassment policies and have access to any complaints procedures. The respondent company had distributed a sexual harassment policy to staff that included details of sexual harassment contact officers. However, the policy was not explained to staff in any way and it was difficult, in practice, to make a complaint. Both of the contact officers listed were based in the head office, while the alleged harassment took place in a regional office. A complaint would have to be made by telephone during office hours when the complainant did not have the privacy to make such a call. The company was found to be liable for the sexual harassment of one of their employees by another. Shiels v James and Lipman Pty Limited [2000] FMCA 2 |
4.2.3 Remedial measures
Even with the most effective and fully implemented sexual harassment policy, harassment can still occur. Employers need to know in advance how they will approach a complaint of sexual harassment in their workplace, and have procedures in place to deal with the harassment.
Advice on developing internal complaints procedures is provided below at Chapter 5.
Employers can also encourage employees to assist in the prevention of sexual harassment in the workplace. For example, employees will often be aware of inappropriate behaviour before management. Staff can be encouraged to report early concerns about unwelcome behaviour before it becomes a serious sexual harassment complaint.
| Case example: Employer not vicariously liable |
The respondent was a lawyer who, in connection with his employment, sexually harassed a client of his employer. The employer, an Aboriginal corporation, was a small organisation and Federal Magistrate Rimmer accepted that it had made its expectations of employees in relation to harassment clear and so did not find the employer to be vicariously liable. The employer discharged its liability by:
In addition, the employer had given a number of warnings to the respondent about his behaviour in relation to a previous complaint of sexual harassment against him. McAlister v SEQ Aboriginal Corporation
for Legal Services [2002] FMCA 109 |
| Case example: Employer vicariously liable |
A woman worked as a catering attendant for a food services company in a canteen at which employees of the respondent company regularly ate. One evening an employee of the company exposed his genitals to her and then grabbed her vagina for a second or two before he walked away. The woman lodged a complaint of sexual harassment against the company. In the action before the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal the issue was whether the company could be held vicariously liable for the actions of its employee. The Tribunal found that the company's actions, which included investigating the assault and recommending disciplinary action against the employee, were insufficient to discharge its vicarious liability. The following strategies were suggested by the Tribunal to prevent sexual harassment in line with avoiding vicarious liability.
The Tribunal emphasised the need for employers to communicate policies to all employees to ensure that they become aware of what may constitute sexual harassment and that it is unlawful. The Tribunal held that it is not enough to distribute materials only to managers, supervisors and contact officers. Coyne v P&O Ports [2000] VCAT 657 |
Guidelines
in Practice: How to remedy sexual harassment |
It is recommended that employers take the following steps to deal with the occurrence of sexual harassment. Implement an internal system for dealing with sexual harassment complaints or adapt existing complaints procedures for this purpose. More information on setting up a complaints procedure is at Chapter 5. Ensure that the organisation’s policy on harassment provides employees with advice on what to do if they are sexually harassed. Employees should be given information on:
|
Case example: Large employer vicariously liable |
A female client of a bank was sexually harassed by the manager of her local branch in the course of accessing banking services. In trying to establish that it had taken all reasonable steps to prevent sexual harassment, the bank gave evidence that it had circulated a code of conduct on sexual harassment, as well as a video, letters, an instruction, a brochure and an article. There was also a system of auditing managers to check their compliance with a requirement that they discuss sexual harassment with their staff every six months. However, direct evidence from staff showed that there had been no recent training on sexual harassment. There were also indications from staff that they did not feel that they could or should take any action against inappropriate behaviour. The Commissioner found that there was virtually no focus on sexual harassment at the bank and that no training or auditing had been undertaken at the branch office where the harassment had taken place. The Commissioner said that, as a large organisation, the bank has a responsibility:
Evans v Lee and Anor (1996) EOC 92-822 |
Footnotes
31. For further information on harassment and new technologies see Joe Catanzariti
"Online and staying in line" Occasional Paper Western Australian
Commissioner of Equal Opportunity, July 2000.
32. See the discussion of natural justice
at 5.2.
Last updated: 24 March 2004.






