DISCRIMINATION IN EMPLOYMENT ON THE
BASIS OF CRIMINAL RECORD


Click here to access:


Submission No. 24 - ACT & Region Chamber of Commerce and Industry

12a Thesiger Court, Deakin ACT
Phone: (02) 6283 5223
Direct Phone: (02) 6283 5238
Direct Fax: (02) 6282 5045
Mobile: 0402 312 964
marion.whalan@actchamber.com.au
www.actchamber.com.au


Mr Stephen Duffield
Director, Human Rights Unit
Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission
GPO Box 5218
SYDNEY NSW 2001

Dear Stephen

COMMENT ON DISCUSSION PAPER: DISCRIMINATION IN EMPLOYMENT ON THE BASIS OF CRIMINAL RECORD

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the discussion paper. The ACT & Region Chamber of Commerce and Industry is a membership based, not-for-profit organisation. As the largest and strongest Canberra based organisation representing local business, the Chamber's membership is diverse with involvement from a wide variety of business types and sizes across Canberra and the surrounding region. Our comments are drawn from the experiences of our members and staff.

2(f) Why might employers be reluctant to employ someone with a criminal record?

Employers have responsibilities to safeguard the welfare of their employees as well as protecting the interests of those who rely on and/or receive services provided by their employees. In recruiting new employees the best predictor of future performance of a job candidate is their past performance. The probity of employees is difficult to establish and employers rely heavily on the comments and experience of referees - preferably who have either current or recent knowledge of the job candidate. Criminal records that have relevance to the duties and role to be performed are a significant indicator of the past integrity of a prospective employee.

4(a) Do employers and employees understand the categories of information that might be included or excluded on a criminal record check provided by police?

In our experience we would have to say no, employers do not understand all the information that is provided on a criminal record check (CRC) by police. Like most government agencies, the police are also guilty of using codes, abbreviations and jargon that are not always easily understood by the lay person.

4(b) When requesting a criminal record check, do employers seek information about specific offences or do they request a general review?

Yes and no. Some employers, such as security firms or transport industry members are quite specific about the nature of convictions they wish to check for. Also our members in child care related activities are also fairly well versed in the specifics of what they seek to check.

There is however, significant variation in the degree of sophistication in which employers ask for CRC's, predominantly due to their lack of understanding as discussed in response to 4(a).

4(c) What difficulties, if any, have employers and employees encountered in obtaining criminal record checks?

Predominantly time delays, which then frustrate the recruitment process.

4(d) Have there been instances where a criminal record check has been completed without an individual's consent?

We believe employer's are very open about the process of checking criminal records. We advise our members to advertise and overtly advise prospective employees of the requirement to agree to a CRC.

5(f) What guidance is available to help employers determine the inherent requirements of the job in the context of employees with a criminal record?

The Chamber's Workplace Relations team assists our members to develop selection criteria and position specifications that accurately reflect the inherent requirements of the job. This sort of work is common in the workers' compensation area already, so some employers have had experience in determining the absolute essential requirements for a position.

However, we would have to qualify our comment above with the observation that until actually impacted, most employers do little in the way of thorough assessment of inherent job requirements. This is one area where we believe further information and education is required.

5(g) What information should be available to actual or prospective employees regarding the inherent requirements of the job?

We recommended to our members that they provide the same set of information to prospective employees that they, the employer, will use in their assessment of the CRC.

6(b) Do you expect employees to voluntarily disclose their criminal record?

If directly asked, either verbally or via an application form which contains such questions - yes, employers expect job candidates to be honest. After all, honesty and integrity are at the heart of the employer/employee relationship.

6(c) How do you respond if an employee refuses to answer questions about their criminal record?

We would advise employers to respond in the same way that they would respond when a job candidate refuses to provide current or recent referees. The reason for not answering the question on a CRC should be probed with the job candidate and the employer's requirement to conduct a CRC reiterated. The employer will then need to consider whether or not they will continue to consider the job candidate who declines to consent to a CRC.

6(d) How do you respond if an employee is dishonest about their criminal record?

As for 6(b) - this impacts on the trust and integrity of the employment relationship. If the deception is serious ie directly related to the job requirements, then dismissal may be appropriate. There are many factors to be considered (refer 7(a)), so we would advise our members on a case by case basis.

6(e) How should employers make sure that they comply with the requirements of spent conviction legislation?

Employers would need information and education to ensure they understand the spent conviction laws applicable in their State or Territory. As this is one aspect of CRC's that arises less frequently, most of our members would contact us to seek advice before dealing with a matter involving spent convictions.

7(a) Do you have any examples of clear procedures for examining an applicant's criminal record? Are there guidelines in your organisation or industry?

The Chamber has guidelines available to our members that outline factors to be considered in assessing the risk to their business that may or may not arise from an employee with a criminal record. As discussed earlier, the nature of the offence and its direct relationship to the inherent requirements of the job is the paramount consideration. Other factors we advised our members to consider included:

  • Frequency in the case of multiple convictions - over what time period were the offences committed
  • Pattern of offences - a pattern may suggest a degree of risk because of persistent unacceptable behaviour
  • Age - offences committed as a youth may be considered differently from the same offences committed as an adult
  • Recency - time lapsed since the conviction(s)
  • Penalty - the quantum and type of penalty awarded by the Court may be an indication of the seriousness of the conviction. Issues arise around good behaviour bonds or probation - trouble free completion will impact on the degree of risk likely.
  • Mitigating or extenuating circumstances - we strongly advise our members to listen to the job candidate/prospective employee and take into account any mitigating circumstances such as provocation, peer group pressure, cultural pressures etc.
  • Decriminalization of offences - the way the offence is penalized now may have changed from an earlier time ie decriminalization of some drug offences.
  • General character since the offence - favourable reports, trouble free completion of suspended sentences or parole or probation

7(b) What would further assist you in understanding your responsibilities and in what form would the information be most useful?

HREOC produces some excellent material now, for example the recent "Good Practice, Good Business" package on eliminating discrimination. Something similar with multiple types of media ie CD, brochures, posters etc we believe would be welcome by the business community.

7(c) Do you have any examples of confusion about whether a criminal record is relevant to the job?

No.

7(d) What review or appeal processes should there be for decisions made on the basis of criminal record?

We believe the process involving HREOC now is a sound model.

7(e) Does your organisation have any training materials that address these issues?

No, but we are planning to develop some.

For clarification on any of the comments herein, please contact the undersigned on telephone 6283 5238.

Yours sincerely

Marion Whalan
Manager, Workplace Relations

 

© Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission. Last updated 20 April 2005.
Your comments and feedback are welcome. Email us at: webfeedback@humanrights.gov.au