Youth Challenge
Teaching human rights & responsibilities.
Unit 1: Resources and Worksheets
Back to Table of Contents || Stage
2
Resource sheet: The origins of modern human rights laws
Throughout history, concepts of ethical behaviour, justice and human
dignity have been important in the development of human societies, as
has the question of the relationship of the individual to the wider community.
Such ideas can be traced back to the ancient civilisations of Babylon,
China and India. They contributed to the laws of Greek and Roman society
and are central to Buddhist, Christian, Confucian, Hindu, Islamic and
Jewish teachings. Concepts of ethics, justice and dignity were also important
in societies which have not left written records, but consist of oral
histories such as those of Indigenous people in Australia and elsewhere.
Ideas about justice were prominent in the thinking of philosophers
in the Middle Ages, the Renaissance and the Enlightenment.
An important strand in this thinking was that there
was a 'natural law' that stood above the law of rulers.
Ideas about justice were prominent in the thinking of philosophers in
the Middle Ages, the Renaissance and the Enlightenment. An important strand
in this thinking was that there was a 'natural law' that stood above the
law of rulers. This meant that individuals had certain rights simply because
they were human beings. Significant development in thinking about human
rights took place in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. This found
expression in the American Declaration of Independence (1776) and the
French Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen (1789). Whereas
earlier the focus had been on the sovereignty of rulers, the emphasis
now started to shift to the rights of the individual as against the state,
with its associated ideas of fundamental freedoms that people should be
able to enjoy.
The
American Declaration of Independence stated:
'We hold these truths to be self-evident,
that all men are created equal, that they
are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that
among
these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.'
The nineteenth and early twentieth centuries saw continuing advances
in social progress, for example in the abolition of slavery, the widespread
provision of education and the extension of political rights. Despite
these advances, international activity on human rights remained weak.
The general attitude was that nations could do what they liked within
their borders and that other countries and the broader international community
had no basis for intervening or even raising concerns when rights were
violated. This is expressed in the term 'sovereignty' or the sovereign
rights of a state to govern as it pleases, make whatever laws or decrees
it wishes, leaving it to others to condemn, praise or ignore.
The
atrocities and violations of human rights that occurred during World War
II galvanised worldwide opinion and made human rights a universal concern.
During World War II millions of soldiers and civilians were killed or
maimed. The Nazi regime in Germany created concentration camps for certain
groups - including Jews, communists, homosexuals and political opponents.
Some of these people were used as slave labour; others were exterminated
in mass executions. The Japanese occupation of China and other Asian countries
was marked by frequent and large-scale brutality toward local populations.
Japanese forces took thousands of prisoners of war who were used as slave
labour, with no medical treatment and inadequate food.
The promotion and protection of human rights became an Allied war objective
after U.S. President Roosevelt proclaimed the 'Four Freedoms' - freedom
of speech and belief, and freedom from want and fear - in 1941. The war
ended in 1945, but only after the destruction of millions of lives, including
through the first and only use of atomic weapons at Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Many countries were devastated by the war, and millions of people died
or became homeless refugees.
As the war drew to a close, the victorious powers decided to establish
a world organisation that would prevent further conflict and help build
a better world. This new organisation was the United Nations, usually
known as the UN, which came into existence in 1945. The purposes of the
UN were essentially fourfold: to ensure peace and security, to promote
economic development, to promote the development of international law
and to ensure the observance of human rights. In pursuit of these goals,
member governments of the UN have set up a vast and complex array of organisations
covering virtually every area of human activity.
The UN's strong emphasis on human rights made it different from previous
international organisations. UN member countries believed that the protection
of human rights would provide for freedom, justice and peace for all in
the future.
The beginning of the UN's basic document,
the UN Charter, stated that the peoples of the United Nations were
determined:
'… to reaffirm faith in fundamental human rights, in
the dignity and worth of the human person, in the equal rights of
men and women and of nations large and small … and to promote social
progress and better standards of life in larger freedom …'
In its early years, the UN set about establishing and documenting basic
human rights standards that would serve all people and all nations. It
has continued to expand the range of standards that set out the obligations
that governments and people can be expected to live up to. In doing this
the UN was aware of the rights of sovereign states to decide whether they
would be bound under International law by these standards or whether they
would incorporate these standards into domestic legislation.
The process of writing these documents takes place in UN meetings, where
representatives of the governments of all the UN's member countries put
their views and negotiate agreements about the acceptable wording. At
the end of this process the UN takes a decision on whether or not to officially
'adopt' the document in question. This is done through the UN's peak body,
the General Assembly.
The first major achievement of the UN in the field of human rights was
the adoption by the General Assembly of the Universal Declaration of Human
Rights in 1948. The details of the wording of the Universal Declaration
were hotly disputed by the members of the UN but its adoption was extremely
important in the history of human rights and international law.
Australia played an active role in the writing of the Universal Declaration.
The Australian Foreign Minister at the time, Dr H.V. Evatt, was Chairman
of the UN General Assembly when the Universal Declaration was adopted.
The United Nations then went on to draft many other treaties and declarations,
many of which drew on the wording and ideas contained in the Universal
Declaration. These human rights 'instruments', as they are called, have
specified how various rights apply to specific groups of people such as
women or children. They have also introduced new concepts that had not
been part of the thinking of those who originally drafted the Universal
Declaration. For those countries that have accepted them, the instruments
have created an obligation on governments in international law to observe
the rights they set out.
The human rights standards developed
by the UN have had a profound influence on the
national law of the various UN member states, including Australia.
The human rights standards developed by the UN have had a profound influence
on the national law of the various UN member states, including Australia.
In the legal systems of some countries, international treaties automatically
become the law of the land. In Australia's case, it is necessary to pass
implementing legislation through the Australian Parliament.
International human rights standards and national human rights laws are
seen as essential to the observance of human rights in particular countries.
It is important that both states and its people be vigilant about the
dangers of human rights abuse, and that individuals should know about
their rights and the rights of others and that they should be able to
use international and national law as well as the legal system and national
human rights institutions to ensure that the promise of human rights protection
is realised.
This document is also available for download
in Word and PDF formats. |