EQUAL ACCESS TO WHEELCHAIR ACCESSIBLE TAXI SERVICES
A submission by Adelaide Independent Taxis July 3 2001
With the passage of Australia’s Disabilities Discrimination Act in 1992 the transport of people in wheelchairs has become a more significant issue on the transport policy maker’s agenda.
Generally, in Adelaide, the response times to people in wheelchairs by the wheelchair accessible taxi sector is greater than that of general taxis to the public.
Why is this so and what can be done to remedy the situation?
The taxi industry in Adelaide currently consists of 920 general taxis and 68 access taxis, a total of 988. The proportion of access taxis to total taxis is almost 7%. Surprisingly a similar percentage is not reflected when we examine the proportion of access customers to total access and taxi customers.
In Radbone and Wooley “ Providing a taxi service for people with disabilities (1998)” during the two-week period of 18-24 Jan1998 and 22-28 February 1998 the Access Cab network dispatched a total of 5264 jobs and had 66 vehicles at its disposal. After the addition of unrecorded private work (estimated at 18%) and access taxi wheelchair hail work (estimated at 2%), a total of 20%, we are able to arrive at an estimated figure of 6316 representing the total amount of taxi bookings carried out during that period.
We also estimate the total amount of work for Adelaide general taxis for those two weeks to be in the vicinity of 140,000 telephone bookings and 90,000 hails, giving us a total of 230,000 jobs.
Total access bookings (5264 + 20% = 6316) 6500 nearest 500
Total general taxi bookings 230,000
Total access and taxi bookings 236500
Proportion of access cab bookings to total access and taxi bookings is 2.75%. To put this in perspective we shall table it in the following manner.
It appears the productivity rate of the access taxi is much lower than that of the general taxi.
If the general taxi industry can cope with its customers to the point of providing a response time of six minutes why can not the access cab sector service its customers as efficiently when they have 2.5 times the supply of vehicles in comparison?
Certain possible reasons emerge:
If we increase the level of access taxi plates in order to spread a wider net of coverage for access customers this may reduce waiting times but may also have a negative impact on the access taxi sector. More licenses would decrease driver income, which in turn will eventually lead to a poorer service and a reduction in the supply of properly trained access taxi drivers. This decrease in income will further compound the problem posed by point 3. A more practical solution may be to improve the system of dispatch.
Access cabs are permitted to compete for general taxi work during the day by two of the three major radio networks in Adelaide. Yellow Cabs locks out access cabs from carrying out general taxi work between the hours of 7.30 a.m. to 9.30 a.m. and 12.30 p.m. to 5.00 p.m. from Monday to Friday, Suburban taxis have no restrictions on access taxis whilst Adelaide Independent Taxis locks out access cabs between 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. Monday to Friday. It becomes apparent that access cabs have the opportunity to supplement their income via the general taxi network.
It is not unusual to find all three (Access, Yellow Cab and Suburban) radio network systems in the same access taxi and it is highly unlikely that at least one general radio system is not represented in an access vehicle. Without doubt a general taxi booking is a desired commodity for the access taxi driver.
This desire may be at the core of the access taxi problem and may also explain why there are no access taxis present in Adelaide Independent Taxis, Adelaide’s largest taxi company that prohibits access taxis from general taxi work from 6a.m. to 6p.m. Monday to Friday.
Another option for transport policy makers is the Universal Wheelchair Accessible Taxis (UWAT). This involves all general taxis to be transformed into UWAT’s. We do not recommend this option, as we believe the problem with the access taxi sector lies in its operation. Apart from the fact that transforming all taxis into UWAT’s would be an incredibly expensive exercise, we must be careful not disadvantage the general public in relation to consumer choice.
The general public prefer to ride in a general taxi rather than an access taxi for these reasons:
(a) smoother ride
(b) more comfort
(c) easier to get in and out of
(d) better aesthetic appearance
It is a common occurrence for general taxi customers to by-pass access taxis on taxi ranks when requiring taxi transport.
The introduction of UWAT’s while possibly reducing waiting times in non- peak periods for people with wheelchairs, would compromise the choices of the taxi consumer and would probably lead to a long term reduction in demand for general taxi services. This could eventually lead to compensation problems.
From all available data, stressing that this data provides only a small sample of the access taxi sector and is over two years old, we conclude that the solution to the higher relative waiting times (an average of 6 minutes for general taxis and an average of 12 minutes for access taxis) for people in wheelchairs lies in the fundamental principles of operation of general taxi radio networks that allow access taxis to use their services during the most important hours for the access customer.
The general taxi radio networks and the relevant authority have conceded the element of control that is so crucial to the integrity of the access taxi system.
For more information contact
Adelaide Independent Taxis
Level 1, 99 Henley Beach Rd.
Mile End SA 5031
Phone (adm): (08) 82021200
Fax (adm): (08) 82021204
Web Page: www.aitaxis.com.au
E-mail: konf@aitaxis.com.au
----- Original Message -----From: Rob LAKESent: Wednesday, July 04, 2001 9:30 AMSubject: testRob Lake
policy research officer
Disability Rights Unit
Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission
Sydney, Australia
ph: 61 2 9284 9613
fax 61 2 9284 9849
www.humanrights.gov.au/disability_rights/index.html
To subscribe to the Disability Rights Unit Update, send an email to listhreoc@humanrights.gov.au
In the body of the message type subscribe drupdate